A Few (More) of MY Unfavorite Things

In the spirit of beating dead horses (making things better), I've continued my wish list for MT changes:

Real Power-editing: Marie from disarranging.com mentioned in the previous article that the power editing mode should allow for assigning multiple categories. I personally think the power editing mode could use even more oomph than that. How about being able to customize just exactly which fields can be edited in that batch mode? I have personally found myself wanting Flickr like managability where I can edit entries, titles and categories en masse just by clicking.

Messy Input: Mark griped that MT allows for "bad characters" in an entry, but I would go further to add that MT's input processing needs a bit of a kick-in-the-pants. This has reared it's ugly head during The Style Contest and numerous times on ProNet. Technically the W3 calls for <p> tags to go inside of <blockquote> tags. However, MT's 'Convert Line Breaks" function will either a) nest paragraph tags improperly or b) simply place <blockquote> tags without <p> tags, depending on how you break your lines. Not to mention it's fickle handling of all other block level HTML tags. Certainly this would take some thinking through because what we want is for the program to figure out what the heck a user is trying to do based on what is entered. But no matter how the user enters text, the program should output valid code (and characters).

More Little Things: Often it's the little things that make the difference between love and hate. You know the options at the bottom of an entry? Imagine a checkbox beneath them marked: "Do this for all entries". Yeah you can change that in the overall settings, but why not put it here while people are thinking about it? For that matter, why not apply that principle across the app? Almost all the great applications give users multiple ways to accomplish the same thing. The program wraps around your style instead of forcing you to think like the programmer who created it.

Tidyness/File Management: One thing that has annoyed me beyond compare is how messy MT is. MT loves to create files, but never seems to get rid of them when changes occur. So you can literally have scores of directories no longer used by MT that are just sitting there taking up your precious disk space. Yes, I realize all the complexities behind fixing this problem. I also realize that this happens only with static publishing, and that's a debate I'll leave to people far more qualified than myself. Perhaps we can kill two birds with one stone and add some simple file management tools. This would certainly help alleviate the upload file issue I complained about last article. This one certainly deserves some more discussion.

Ajaxify: Now, I avoid buzzwords at all costs; but with a recent surge in websites that look more like desktop apps, we really need to hop on that train. I'm not talking about overusing throbbers *coughArvindcough*. I'm talking about throwing the click-wait-click-wait experience out on it's head for something that'll do for blogging what del.icio.us did for social bookmarking and Google Maps did for going places.

Please, keep the comments coming. I think this is a great discussion, and the more we can get out in the open, the greater the chance for change.

  • posted on 18 May 2006
  • by Jesse

InterAction:

18 May 20061. LaRosa Johnson:

i have to agree with you 100% on the file management... and it shouldn't take too much work to get that working. why? because it when you switch from static to dynamic publishing it will rename the static file to filename.html.static.... instead of doing that, why not simply delete the static file completely? and if you do have static publishing, why not just delete the static page when it's deleted instead of simply removing any links to it.

some valid HTML would be nice too... most times, that's a non-issue for me as i can fix it myself, but that blockquote tag can be a pain in the rear

by far, my biggest complaint though would have to be the search functionality. they should have a search template within the system instead of having to manually add it to the template folder. also i'd like to make it native to each blog within the install... i hate the fact that when people search on UrbanWordz that it takes them to Trailblazin' Ministries (even though i have a template setup so it looks like u haven't left the site)... it's just one of those lil' annoying things that bugs the heck out of me. plus, i'd like to be able to search within my templates too (cuz sometimes i put static content in them that isn't searchable by MT)

even with my minor gripes about MT, i still think it's by far the best blogging/CMS software i've used to date

18 May 20062. LaRosa Johnson:

also... Jesse... can you add the login button for TypeKey to the comments? @ a new work PC and there's no option that i see to login to my TypeKey account for comments :) thanks!

lj.

18 May 20063. Jesse Gardner:

@Larosa: Here, here in re: to search templates! But I have a solution for you that includes php and makes the whole thing so much easier. I'll try to post the article to Movable Tweak in the next day or so.

18 May 20064. Jesse Gardner:

@Larosa: Sorry, also, I'll get the TypeKey functionality integrated again. I forgot to include that in my new IEAs.

18 May 20065. Mike Randall:

To add to the "feature requests" in MT:

I'd like to see the addition of doing file uploads en masse. It would be great to point to a directory, (i.e. images, ) and specify where you want them to go and click. It would be nicer than doing FTP and then creating your entries.

Perhaps 6A would open a forum where we could deposit these feature requests. I knopw that a lot of big software and application companies do this iften in the enterprise space. What better resource to tap into than the people who use the product?


YourThoughts?



(Minutia)

This entry was written by Jesse on Thursday, May 18, 2006 at 4:05 AM and appears in the 0's and 1's chapter. The previous article was entitled, "These Are a Few of My Unfavorite Things", and the next entry is called, "Porn-free Download". Bookmark the permalink, save it to del.icio.us or Digg it.

GetUpdated

ElseWhere

Find me on aim Find me on delicious Find me on digg Find me on linkedin Find me on pownce Find me on twitter Find me on youtube Find me on skype Find me on facebook Find me on livejournal Find me on msn Find me on vox Find me on technorati Find me on yahoo Find me on dopplr

ActionStream

  • Jesse bookmarked RSS: Best Design Practices And Icons | Design Showcase | Smashing Magazine Jesse bookmarked RSS: Best Design Practices And Icons | Design Showcase | Smashing Magazine 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z 2008-08-07T22:48:21Z
  • Jesse said, "Just learned something new: "Bridesmaid" is actually a shortened form of "bridesmaiden", which is singular. So "bridesmaids" is correct." Jesse said, “Just learned something new: "Bridesmaid" is actually a shortened form of "bridesmaiden", which is singular. So "bridesmaids" is correct.” 2008-08-07T19:07:51Z 2008-08-07T19:07:51Z
  • Jesse said, "Help me Twitter! What is the plural of bridesmaid? Bridesmaids or bridesmaiden?" Jesse said, “Help me Twitter! What is the plural of bridesmaid? Bridesmaids or bridesmaiden?” 2008-08-07T18:56:15Z 2008-08-07T18:56:15Z
  • Jesse said, "Seems like the "I-want-a-website" faery visited a lot of people this week." Jesse said, “Seems like the "I-want-a-website" faery visited a lot of people this week.” 2008-08-07T18:24:46Z 2008-08-07T18:24:46Z
  • Jesse said, "I wonder what our children will say about Twitter." Jesse said, “I wonder what our children will say about Twitter.” 2008-08-07T15:13:07Z 2008-08-07T15:13:07Z