Holiness, The Great Battle
John Wesley, one of great 19th century revivalists, taught that a Christian could attain "entire sanctification" or sinless perfection here on this earth. His understanding of 2 Timothy 3:17 led him to believe that by "perfect", Paul meant to imply that a person can reach a point where the sin desire is eradicated. Unfortunately, many still struggled with sin and turned to despair because they could not reach this perfection Wesley preached, but were instead pockmarked with failure and missteps.
Bearing the Cross
What Wesley's teachings failed to emphasize was our responsibility to daily take up our cross. His Calvinism was showing here; Wesley would say that any genuine Christian is called by God and therefore could and should attain perfection. He might also take us to 1 John 3:9 in defense of sinless perfection. But this verse doesn't teach sinless perfection. This is a call to holiness; this is a call to live out the purity and holiness afforded us with our new nature. Just one chapter earlier, in 2 Timothy 2:21, God makes it clear that the reponsibility for being usable vessels falls into our hands. In fact, one letter earlier, in 1 Timothy 4:7, Paul explains to Timothy that godliness is something that can be reached, in part, by excercising.
The first time I stood on a soccer field to play, I was terrible. I was playing, but it was a pathetic showing. After years and years of excercising and practicing, I became far more capable that I had been the first time I set foot on that field. So even though I was on the team and still considered a player, I did not play as well when I first began than I do now.
Living the Position
So it is with holiness. We have no strength to be holy, save through the power of the Spirit and the redemption of Christ. But this strength infuses our newborn bodies and it takes excercise before we can walk with steady legs. The Bible makes it clear that we can still refuse to avail ourselves of that holy power; only when we claim our God-given role and let that positional reality start effecting our practical reality will we see holiness.
Bob Wilkin said it best in is treatise "Do Born Again People Sin?", "1 John 1:8,10 [says] that believers cannot attain to sinless perfection in their experience. However, we can allow our new natures to dominate our experience so that we live consistently godly lives. May we live like who we are: children of the Holy One who has saved us by His amazing, free grace."
Considering the Battle
Throughout the Scriptures, sin is often addressed with severe, military-like action. Ephesians 6 draws the parallel between our spiritual tools and the weapons of war. Satan is called our adversary and he is described as a lion who is seeking for people to devour.
Let's spend a moment in 2 Corinthians 10:5, "Casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ;" "Casting down" and "bringing into captivity" are not playtime phrases. Casting down was what was done to idols in the Old Testament. And read "bringing into captivity" as "taking prisoners". You don't take prisoners in a baseball game. You don't take prisoners in Scrabble. You take prisoners when you are at war.
Our battle to live holy lives is a war that exists between who we are in Christ and the propensity to sin within our flesh. Genuine saving faith is demonstrated by giving aid and comfort to the Spirit of the Living God while denying reinforcements to the forces of the flesh.
CORRECTION: Wesley was not a Calvinist; in fact, he was a pioneer of the Arminianism we know today. I drew my conclusions from a misreading of the chapter on Holiness in George Marsden's Fundamentalism and American Culture.
InterAction:
26 June 20062. Keith:
Hi Jesse:
I think your observations on the battle for holiness are on point. Thanks for your clear presentation.
I'd have to agree with Nate, though, about Wesley and Calvinism.
As to his view on Christians and the Cross, Wesley said in his commentary on Mat. 16:24:
"...Let him deny himself, and take up his cross - A rule that can never be too much observed: let him in all things deny his own will, however pleasing, and do the will of God, however painful. Should we not consider all crosses, all things grievous to flesh and blood, as what they really are, as opportunities of embracing God's will at the expense of our own? And consequently as so many steps by which we may advance toward perfection? We should make a swift progress in the spiritual life, if we were faithful in this practice."
What I think many folks find confusing about Wesley's position is phrases like "entire sanctification," which make it sound as if Christians may arrive at a state where they never do wrong. This wan't Wesley's view. In his "A Plain Account of Christian Perfection," Wesley proclaims the possibility of perfection from knowing, willful sin by faith in God and motivated by love for God. He acknowledges the possibility of ignorance and weakness resulting in wrong conduct, but separates this from rebellion, or willful sin.
Keith
26 June 20063. Jesse Gardner:
Thanks for the "sharpening" guys. That's what happens when you read church history books after midnight. I made a note in the original entry.
One of the things I'm not to sure I agree with is Wesley's limiting of sin to "nothing ... but a voluntary transgression of a known law of God." This really seems like an attempt to "lower the bar" to perfection can be reached. To me, that's like lowering the standards on a test, just so you can flaunt your A.
YourThoughts?
(Minutia)
This entry was written by Jesse on Monday, June 26, 2006 at 1:01 AM and appears in the Savior chapter. The previous article was entitled, "Curiouser and Curiouser", and the next entry is called, "10 Days Straight!!!". Bookmark the permalink, save it to del.icio.us or Digg it.
GetUpdated
ElseWhere
AllChapters
- 50 articles in the chapter 0's and 1's
- 35 articles in the chapter America
- 54 articles in the chapter Blogging
- 34 articles in the chapter Ears
- 36 articles in the chapter Eyes
- 23 articles in the chapter Family Ties
- 18 articles in the chapter Friends
- 1 articles in the chapter Games
- 3 articles in the chapter Great-Grandmother
- 58 articles in the chapter Heart
- 4 articles in the chapter Intercessional
- 61 articles in the chapter Journeys
- 44 articles in the chapter Kicks and Giggles
- 47 articles in the chapter Mind
- 28 articles in the chapter Miscellany
- 16 articles in the chapter Movies
- 2 articles in the chapter Podcasts
- 31 articles in the chapter Retrospection
- 64 articles in the chapter Savior
- 2 articles in the chapter Tech Tips
- 32 articles in the chapter The Pen
- 6 articles in the chapter Wedding/Honeymoon
- 19 articles in the chapter World
BiteSize.journal
ReaderFavorites
- The Mosquito Tone Test
- The Girl And The Boy: An Engagement Story
- Would Jesus Have Cared About The Cake?
- 10 Signs of a Jesus Follower
- Erego Ergo Sum (I Pay, Therefore I Am)
- A Libertarian View of Pensacola Christian College
- Situational Ethics
- Rich White People
- Fundamentalism and the Gentleness of Wisdom
- 10 Tips For Creating Website Mockups In Photoshop


















26 June 20061. Nate G:
One problem I see with this entry is that Wesley was not Calvinist - he was, as we may say, the founder of British, and thence American, Arminianism. He fought Whitefield tooth and nail over the issue, and one of the first wedges Wesley drove in the relationship was a public sermon in which he blasted Whitefield's Calvinistic doctrines of Predestination, Reprobation, and Perseverance of the Saints. If any man was ever an Arminian, it was Wesley. He believed in loss of salvation, as illustrated in his commentary entry on John 5:24, where Jesus says that those who truly believe do not come into condemnation. Wesley limits the statement by saying, "If they don't make shipwreck of their faith, that is." If anything, Wesley can best be seen in his views as a ProtoPentecostal.